- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:855 WP No. 107364 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.107364 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SHRI. MUDDAPPA @ MUDAKAPPA S/O. VEERABHADRAPPA IDDALAGI, AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NANWADGI VILLAGE, TQ. ILKAL, DIST. BAGALKOT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. UDAYASHANKAR SHINDE, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. SUGAPPA S/O. VEERABHADRAPPA IDDALAGI, AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NANWADGI VILLAGE, TQ. ILKAL, DIST. BAGALKOT-587125. 2. SRI. AMRAPPA S/O. VEERABHADRAPPA IDDALAGI, AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NANDAWADGI VILLAGE, TQ. ILKAL, DIST. BAGALKOT. REAL AND TRUE-R/O. HANCNAL VILLAGE, Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:855 WP No. 107364 of 2025 TQ. LINGASUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584122. 3. SHRI. VEERESH S/O. SANGAPPA IDDALAGI, AGE. 26 YEARS, OCC. PVT. JOB IN BENGALURU, R/O. GORABAAL VILLAGE, TQ. LINGASUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584122. 4. SRI. VEERESH S/O. AMRAPPA IDDALAGI, AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. NANDAWADGI VILLAGE, TQ. ILKAL, DIST. BAGALKOT, REAL AND TRUE - R/O. HANCNAL VILLAGE, TQ. LINGASUR, DIST. RAICHUR-584122. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO KINDLY ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO THE TRIAL COURT TO PASS THE ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION ON IA-2 DATED 23.02.2024 ON UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC AT ANNEXURE-F FILED IN THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNGUND COURT SITTING AT ITINERARY ILKAL IN THE OS NO.144/2024 AND ETC.,. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:855 WP No. 107364 of 2025 ORAL ORDER On 21.01.2026, as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption for ‘dismissal’. 2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MEG CT: UMD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1