Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5610 (RAJ)

SUDHANSHU W/O ARUN KUMAR MEHRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/2851/2026 · 2026-03-25

Anand Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12664] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2851/2026 Sudhanshu W/o Arun Kumar Mehra, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of 6/2043, Mukta Prasad Nagar, Bikaner (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary To The Govt., Department Of Education, Govt. Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. The Project Director, Rajasthan Government Health Scheme, Vitta Bhawan, Rajasthan Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Verma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 25/03/2026 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayers: "It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that your Lordships may pleased to accept and allow the Writ Petition and call for the entire record related to the matter of petitioners and by an appropriate writ, order or direction:- i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the impugned action of the respondents by which deactivated the RGHS card of petitioner without any illegality committed by the petitioner may kindly be declare illegal and arbitrary; [2026:RJ-JP:12664] (2 of 3) [CW-2851/2026] ii) Further may kindly be directed to respondents to activate the petitioner's RGHS card bearing No. 240420212318199614 of petitioner with immediate effect; iii) Further the Hon'ble Court may kindly be disposed of the said writ petition in the light of order passed in case of Pawan Meena (Supra); iv) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may also be passed in the facts and circumstances of the case." 2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is a Government servant and holding a substantive post of Teacher Grade II and is also having RGHS Card No.240420212318199614. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is suffering from severe heart disease and has been advised Cardiac surgery; however, the respondents have blocked the RGHS Card of the petitioner, which could have otherwise enabled the petitioner to get her treatment in the approved hospital in cashless manner. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has never misused her RGHS Card and the order of deactivation/blocking of RGHS Card is arbitrary. 3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that against the order of deactivation of RGHS Card, the petitioner submitted a representation before the Project Director RGHS, Jaipur and also appeared for personal hearing before the aforesaid authority. After hearing the petitioner, the representation/appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed vide order dated 06.02.2026. Learned counsel submits that the order dated 06.02.2026 is appealable in nature and the petitioner can file appeal before CEO Chief Executive Officer, Rajasthan State Health Assurance Agency (RSHAA). [2026:RJ-JP:12664] (3 of 3) [CW-2851/2026] 4. In view of above, where the grievance raised by the petitioner in this writ petition was also parallely raised by him before the appropriate authority and by giving factual finding, the representation has been dismissed vide order dated 06.02.2026, at this stage, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. However, mere dismissal of this writ petition would not take away rights of the petitioner to challenge the order dated 06.02.2026 in accordance with law. 5. In case, the petitioner filed appeal against the order dated 06.02.2026 within a period of 7 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the Appellate Authority within a period of 15 days thereafter. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/352