Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5610 (PNJ)

RAVI PARKASH AND ANOTHER v. ANURAG RASTOGI AND OTHERS

COCP/2096/2026 · 2026-05-04

Nidhi Gupta

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HI 112 Ravi Parkash Anurag Rast CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW Kumar and o 2. respondent terms of ord similar con ‘Mainpal Sin 3. 4. 5. 04.05.2026 rishu E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o arkash and another Versus g Rastogi and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advoca Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 14.01.2025 (Annex CWP Nos. 570, 595, 688 and r and others vs. State of Haryana and o At the very outset, it is admitte dent-State that the present contempt p of order dated 27.05.2025 (Annexure r contempt petition bearing No. pal Singh vs. Anurag Rastogi, Chief Se Ordered accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-2096-2026 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA dvocate for the petitioners. l. A.G. Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ and 698-2025, titled as ‘Subhash and others’. admitted by learned counsel for the empt petition may be disposed of in nexure P-2) passed by this Court in No. COCP-2666-2025, titled as hief Secretary, Haryana and others’. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No ging Writ hash the f in rt in as ’. RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.06 11:40 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.