Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5609 (ORI)

NIRANJAN SAHU@RUNA SAHU v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMC/314/2026 · 2026-03-17

S K Panigrahi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.314 of 2026 Niranjan Sahu @ Runa Sahu …. Petitioner(s) Mr. Ashok Das, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Raj Bhushan Dash, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 17.03.2026 04. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The Petitioner has filed this CRLMC assailing the order of NBW dated 10.07.2025 issued by the learned Court in seisin over the matter in G.R. Case No.1111 of 2008, against him. 3. Heard. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner have been on bail since 01.07.2011. He was regularly attending the court on each date of posting of the case. However, on 10.07.2025, the Petitioner could not remain present in court due to noncommunication by the conducting Counsel. Hence, the learned Court in seisin over the matter issued the order of N.B.W. against him. He further submits that the Petitioner undertakes to cooperate Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 17-Mar-2026 17:05:15 Signature Not Verified p. 2 till the end of the trial and appear before the learned court below on each date of posting of the case without fail. 5. At this juncture, learned counsel for the State, on instruction, submits that the Petitioner is a regular absconder and he does not appear in the Court regularly. He further contends that due to such activities of the Petitioner the trial in the above noted case is running in a senile pace which is not conducive to the criminal justice system. In order to substantiate his above claim, he also draws the attention of this Court to the status report submitted on this issue by the learned J.M.F.C(R), (Cog.), Berhampur He, accordingly, prays for dismissal of this CRLMC. 6. Considering the above submissions, this Court is not inclined to entertain the prayer made in this CRLMC. However, considering the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court directs the Petitioners to surrender before the learned court in seisin over the matter in the aforesaid case and move for bail within a period of fifteen working days hence which shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. 7. Accordingly, this CRLMC is disposed of. (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Ayaskanta Designation: Personal Assistant