CRL.OP.No.18700 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16-07-2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL.OP.No.18700 of 2026 B.Advaidh ..Petitioner(s) Vs. 1. State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, T-14, Pallikaranai Traffic Investigation Wing, Tambaram City. 2. Jeyapraveenraj S. 3. Ganesh S. ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to call for the records pertaining to Crime No.197 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, T-14 Pallikaranai Traffic Investigation Wing, Tambaram City and quash the same in exercise of its powers under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. For Petitioner(s): Mr.AGD Bala Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran (for R1) Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Crl.Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.No.18700 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER This criminal original petition seeks to quash the FIR in Crime No.197 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent Police, on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the Court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another reported in (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The background facts leading to the present case are that while the third respondent/victim was walking along the road, the petitioner, who was driving a Royal Enfield motorcycle in a rash, negligent and inebriated condition, hit the victim from behind, causing injuries. The second https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.No.18700 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 respondent/de facto complainant and the third respondent/victim are present before this Court and have submitted that since the parties are neighbours, they do not wish to claim any compensation or proceed with the case any further. Consequently, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and ironed out their differences. 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P.No.18700 of 2026 stands allowed. The FIR in Crime No.197 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent Police, is hereby quashed. 16-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes Sni https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL.OP.No.18700 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. Sni To 1.The Inspector of Police, T-14, Pallikaranai Traffic Investigation Wing, Tambaram City. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. CRL.OP.No.18700 of 2026 16-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis