Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 56025 (MAD)

MR.VEERAKUMAR v. The Tahsildar

WP/27811/2026 · 2026-07-17

Krishnan Ramasamy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 27811 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 27811 of 2026 Veerakumar ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Tahsildar, Sulur Taluk Office, Coimbatore District – 641 402. 2. The Surveyor, Sulur Taluk Office, Coimbatore District – 641 402. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue writ of mandamus, directing the respondents R1 and R2 to measure the petitioner’s land comprised in Survey Nos.275/3A and 275/3B situated at Kammalapatti Village, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District and consequently direct the respondents to fix the boundaries by placing survey stones within a time frame and pass such further or other orders. For Petitioner: Mr.S.Ranjith Kumar For Respondents: Mr.C.Prabakaran Government’s Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents R1 and R2 to measure the petitioner’s land comprised in Survey Nos.275/3A and 275/3B situated at Kammalapatti Village, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District and https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27811 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 consequently direct the respondents to fix the boundaries by placing survey stones within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court. 2.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner submitted a representation dated 24.02.2026 to survey the petitioner’s land, measure the property and fix boundaries in Survey Nos.275/3A and 275/3B situated at Kammalapatti Village, Sulur Taluk, Coimbatore District. However, the same was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition. 3.Mr.C.Prabakaran, learned Government’s Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and submitted that the petitioner’s representation dated 24.02.2026 will be considered within a period of six weeks. 4.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. 5. Considering the limited relief sought by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.02.2026 on merits and in accordance with law, and carry out a survey and complete the process, after giving prior notice to the petitioner and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27811 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 receipt of a copy of this order. 6. 6. It is made clear that this order is passed only for the purpose of issuing a direction to the official respondents to conduct a survey and lay boundary stones at the subject land. In the event any dispute arises regarding the possession of the subject property, the same has to be decided by way of filing a suit before the competent Civil Court. 7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. 17-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To 1. The Tahsildar, Sulur Taluk Office, Coimbatore District – 641 402. 2. The Surveyor, Sulur Taluk Office, Coimbatore District – 641 402. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 27811 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 27811 of 2026 17-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis