APHC010351162017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 272/2017 Between: 1. MR. YARLAGADDA KRISHNA MURTHY,, S/O. Y. SITA RAMAIAH, INDIAN, 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 30, 2ND CROSS ROAD, SUBBA RAO COLONY, BHARATHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA -08. 2. MRS. YARLAGADDA SUGUNAMANI,, W/O. Y. KRISHNA MURTHY, INDIAN, 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT D.NO. 30, 2ND CROSS ROAD, SUBBA RAO COLONY, BHARATHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA -08. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. SAIPRIYA CHIT FUND PRIVATE LIMITED, having its registered office at 2" floor, Naaz buildings, Naaz . Centre, Guntur, having branch office at Vijayawada, represented by its Foreman/Managing Director, Mr. Yadla Sambasiva Rao, S/o. Simhachalam, Hindu, 65 years, Arundalpet, Vijayawada-2. ...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP 323 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 16 days in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(ASMP 706 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings of decree and judgement passed in OS No.111/2010 on the file of XII Addl.District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District including the execution in the interest of justice and equity Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. D VENKATA RAMANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K V BHANU PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 272/2017 JUDGMENT:- Mr. K. Praveen, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. Venkata Ramana Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that a memo was filed before the Registry on 02.07.2026, inter alia, stating that the Managing Director of the respondent- Company died on 29.07.2025, consequently, the learned counsel for the respondent filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the execution proceedings by not pressing execution petition in O.S. No.111 of 2010 on the file of the learned XII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, and accordingly, the said Execution Petition stood dismissed as not pressed. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants further submits that, in view of the dismissal of the execution petition as not pressed, no further orders survive for consideration in the present appeal, and the appeal has therefore become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 10.07.2026 LSP