Page No.# 1/13 GAHC010082612026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1399/2026 IBRAHIM ALI LASKAR AND ORS S/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA, R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II, P.O. CHIPARSANGAN, P.S. ALGAPUR, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 2: ISHAQUE ALI LASKAR @ ICHAK ALI LASKAR S/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPARSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3: ISUB ALI LASKAR @ YUCHUB ALI LASKAR S/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPARSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4: NURJAN BIBI W/O- ABDUL MAJID LASKAR R/O- BAKRIHAWAR PART-III P.O. KALINAGAR P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5: ON THE DEATH OF SHONGU BIBI HER LEGAL HEIRS 5.1: ABDUL GAFUR S/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II Page No.# 2/13 P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5.2: LAILA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5.3: HUSNA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5.4: MONOWARA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6: FATHIMA BIBI D/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPASANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSA VERSUS ABDUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA AND ORS S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI, R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II, P.S. ALGAPUR, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM 2:ABDUL REJAK BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3:ABDUL MOTIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI Page No.# 3/13 R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4:BAHAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA @ YASIN ALI S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5:ABU KASHIM BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6:SAMSUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 7:FAKAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 8:BIBI AYESHA W/O- HAZI TAYUB ALI R/O- BAKRIHAWAR PART-VI P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788802. 9:ABDUL HASIB LASKAR SECRETARY JUKURGRAM MASJID R/O- VILL.- CHIPORSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPORSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM Page No.# 4/13 PIN- 788801 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N HAQUE, MR. A K AZAD,MR H I CHOUDHURY,MR. S R BARBHUIYA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN, MR. M H SAIKIA (R-1 TO 9),MR. N I MAZARBHUYAN (R-1 TO 9) Linked Case : RSA/105/2021 IBRAHIM ALI LASKAR AND 5 ORS. S/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPARSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 2: ISHAQUE ALI LASKAR @ ICHAK ALI LASKAR S/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPARSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3: ISUB ALI LASKAR @ YUCHUB ALI LASKAR S/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPARSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4: NURJAN BIBI W/O- ABDUL MAJID LASKAR R/O- BAKRIHAWAR PART-III P.O. KALINAGAR P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5: ON THE DEATH OF SHONGU BIBI Page No.# 5/13 HER LEGAL HEIRS 5.1: ABDUL GAFUR S/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5.2: LAILA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5.3: HUSNA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5.4: MONOWARA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6: FATHIMA BIBI D/O- LATE HAJI KALA MIA R/O- CHIPARSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPASANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS ABDUL HOQUE BARBHUIYA AND 8 ORS. S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 2:ABDUL REJAK BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI Page No.# 6/13 R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3:ABDUL MOTIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4:BAHAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA @ YASIN ALI S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5:ABU KASHIM BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6:SAMSUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 7:FAKAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 8:BIBI AYESHA W/O- HAZI TAYUB ALI R/O- BAKRIHAWAR PART-VI P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788802. 9:ABDUL HASIB LASKAR Page No.# 7/13 SECRETARY JUKURGRAM MASJID R/O- VILL.- CHIPORSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPORSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788801. ------------ Advocate for : MR. N HAQUE Advocate for : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN (R-1 TO 9) appearing for ABDUL HOQUE BARBHUIYA AND 8 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 06.05.2026 Heard Mr. N. Hoque, learned counsel appearing for the applicants. Aslo heard Mr. I. S. Mazarbhuiyan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. N. H. Mazarbhuiyan, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 9. 2. By way of this application under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the applicants seek a decree on compromise based on a lawful agreement in writing signed by the parties in respect of the subject matter of the suit arising out of RSA No. 105/2021. 3. The applicants, as plaintiffs, had instituted Title Suit No. 26/2013 before the Court of the learned Munsiff, Hailakandi, seeking, inter alia, a declaration that they are the sole legal heirs of late Kala Mia in respect of the suit pattas; that Arabjan Bibi is not a shareholder of the suit pattas as she is not a legal heir of late Kala Mia; that the mutation granted in favour of Mayab Ali in place of Arabjan Bibi is illegal; and that Page No.# 8/13 the Wakf Nama dated 02.01.1991 is void. 4. The said suit came to be dismissed by the judgment and decree dated 13.03.2019 passed by the learned trial court. Upon appeal being preferred, the appellate court, by judgment and decree dated 30.03.2021, affirmed the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court. Aggrieved thereby, the applicants preferred the connected Regular Second Appeal before this Court, which was admitted on the following substantial questions of law: “(a) Whether the learned Courts below erred in law in passing the impugned judgment and decree declaring title of the predecessor of the defendants and the defendants on the basis of inheritance, without there being any evidence on record to establish that the defendants or their predecessor had acquired right, title and interest over the suit pattas in accordance with Sections 8, 9, 11 and 15 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886? (b) Whether the learned Courts below erred in law in dismissing the plaintiffs’ suit solely on the basis of mutation entries, i.e. Exhibits 1 to 10, without any evidence showing that the predecessor of the defendants inherited the land covered by the suit pattas from the original pattadar, and without considering the settled proposition that mere mutation entries in revenue records do not confer title? (c) Whether the learned Courts below were justified in deciding Issue No. 3 relating to burden of proof without properly Page No.# 9/13 applying Sections 103 and 106 of the Indian Evidence Act?” 5. It is the specific case of the applicants that during the pendency of the Regular Second Appeal, the applicants and the opposite parties/respondents entered into a written compromise agreement in respect of the suit land and amicably settled the dispute on the terms and conditions embodied in the compromise deed. The relevant portions of the compromise deed are reproduced hereinbelow: “DEED OF COMPROMISE This DEED OF COMPROMISE is made on this 16th day of April, 2026 at Hallakandi. BETWEEN (1) Ibrahim All Laskar, age 78 years, (2) Ishaque All Laskar, age 72 years, Sons of Late Haji Kala Mia, Residents of Village: Chiporsangan Part-II, P.O: Chiporsangan, P.S: Algapur, District: Hailakandi, Assam, (3) Nurjan Bibl, age 90 years, W/O Abdul Majid Laskar, Resident of Village: Bakrihawar Part-ll, P.O: Kalinagar, P.S: Panchgram, District: Hailakandi, Assam, (4) On the death of Shongu Bibi W/O Late Nimar Ali, herlegal heirs; (1) Abdul Gafur Barbhulya, age 52 years, (II) Laila Begum Barbhuiya, age 54 years, (III) Husna Begum Barbhuiya, age 49 years, (iv) Monowara Begum Barbhuiya, age 40 years, All are son and daughters of Late Nimar All, Residents of Village: Chandipur Part-II, P.O: Kalibaribazar, P.S: Algapur, District: Hailakandi, Assam (5) Fatima Bibi, age 60 years, D/O Late Haji Kala Mia, Residents of Village: Chiporsangan Part-II, P.O. Chiporsangan, P.S: Algapur, District: Hailakandi, Assam, hereinafter called the 1st Partles. -AND- (1) Abdul Haque Barbhulya, age 90 years, (2) Abdul Rezak Barbhulya, age 83 years, (3) Abdul Motin Barbhuiya, age 77 years, (4) Bahar Uddin Barbhulya@Yasin Ali, age 65 years, (5) Abdul Kashim Barbhuiya, age 60 years, (6) Samsul Haque Barbhulya, age 57 years, (7) Fakar Uddin Barbhulya, age 50 years, All are sons of Late Mayub Ali, Residents of Village: Chandipur Part-II, P.O: Kallbaribazar, P.S: Algapur, District: Hailakandi, Assam, (8) Bibi Page No.# 10/13 Ayesha, age 86 years, W/O Hazi Tayub Ali, Resident of Village: Bakrihawar Part-VI, P.O: Kalinagar, P.S: Panchgram, District: Hailakandi, Assam, (9) Abdul Hasib Laskar, age 40 years, Secretary Tukargram Masjid, Residents of Village: Chiporsangan Part-II, P.O: Chiporsangan, P.S: Algapur, District: Hailakandi, Assam 2nd Parties. WHEREAS the 1st parties as plaintiffs had filed a suit being T.S No.26/2013 in the Court of Munsiff No.1, Hailakandi praying a decree to declare that they are the only legal heirs of late Haji Kala Mia and for a decree to declare that Arabjan Bibl did not Inherit any property with legal heirs of late Haji Kala Mia who was the pattadar of 2nd R.S. Patta No.159/158/151/155/147/77/128/150/160/134 under Porgona- Hallakandi, Mouza- Chiporsangan Pt-II in the district of Hallakandi and for a declaration that the Deed of Wakfnama dated 02.01.1991 is vold. AND WHEREAS, the T.S. No.26/2013 was dismissed by judgment & decree dated 10.04.2019 passed by the Ld. Munsiff No.1, Hallakandi and the sald judgment & decree dated 10.04.2019 was affirmed by the Ld. Civil Judge, Hallakandi in T.A. No.8/2019 by judgment & decree dated 30.03.2021. AND WHEREAS, one Regular Second Appeal being R.S.A. No.105/2021 was filed before the Hon'ble High Court against the judgment & decree dated 30.03.2021 by the 1 Parties and the sald Regular Second Appeal has been admitted by the Hon'ble High Court by Order dated 01.11.2021. AND WHEREAS, the partles hereln-above mutually compromise the sult In connection with aforesald Regular Second Appeal as follows: (1) The second partles have relinquished their claim over the land covered by Patta No. 159/ 158/151/155/147/77/128/150/160 and 134 as described in Schedule-1 of the Plaint In T.S. No.26/2013 which was filed by the 1st Parties against the 2nd Partles in the Court of Munsiff No.1, Hallakandi and for such relinquishment the 1st Parties have pald an amount of Rs.300000.00 (Rupees Three Lakhs) only in favour of the 2nd Partles. (2) The 2nd Parties will not have any right, title and interest over the sald patta No. 159/ 158/151/155/147/77/128/150/160 and 134 as described in Schedule-1 of the Plaint in T.S. No.26/2013. The names of the Second Parties will be deleted from the revenue record in respect of said Page No.# 11/13 PattaNo.159/158/151/155/147/77/128/150/160 and 134. The 1st Parties will be only pattadars of the sald Patta No. 159/158/151/155/147/77/128/150/160 and 134 as described in Schedule-1 of the Plaint In T.S. No.26/2013 and accordingly the revenue record will be corrected. (3) The DEED No.13 dated 01.01.1991 executed by the predecessor of the 2nd Partles Mayub All In favour of the Secretary, Tukargram Masjid as as described in Schedule-1 of the Plaint In T.S. No.26/2013 will not have any affect so far the land measuring 6 Khatas (Out of 9 Khata 11 Chatak) covered by Dag No. 402, 506, 508, 511, 2nd R.S Patta No.147 of Porgona- Hallakandi, Mouza- Chiporsangan Pt-II in the district of Hallakandi, Assam which is bounded by- NORTH: Ishaque All Laskar and Ibrahim All Laskar SOUTH: Road EAST: Road WEST: Ibrahim Ali Laskar (4) The 1st Partles will have right, title and Interest over the 6 Khatas of land (out of 9 Khata 11 Chatak) covered by Dag No. 402, 506, 508, 511, 2nd R.S. Patta No.147 of Porgona-Hailakandi, Mouza- Chiporsangan Pt-II in the district of Hallakandi, Assam which is bounded by- NORTH: Ishaque Ali Laskar and Ibrahim Ali Laskar SOUTH: Road EAST: Road WEST: Ibrahim Ali Laskar (5) The 1 Partles will mutate their names in revenue record in respect of the above land measuring6 Khatas of land (out of 9 Khata 11 Chatak) and the remaining 3 Khata 11 Chatak will retain in the name of 2nd Parties. The 2nd Parties will not have right, title and Interest over the said 6 Khatas of land which is part of Schedule-11 of the Plaint In T.S. No.26/2013. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed this DEED OF COMPROMISE on the day, month and year first above written.” Page No.# 12/13 6. Order XXIII Rule 3 of the CPC reads as follows: “3. Compromise of suit.—Where it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise 1 [in writing and signed by the parties] or where the defendant satisfied the plaintiff in respect to the whole or any part of the subject-matter of the suit, the Court shall order such agreement, compromise or satisfaction to be recorded, and shall pass a decree in accordance therewith 2 [so far as it relates to the parties to the suit, whether or not the subject matter of the agreement, compromise or satisfaction is the same as the subject-matter of the suit:] [Provided that where it is alleged by one party and denied by the other that an adjustment or satisfaction has been arrived at, the Court shall decide the question; but not adjournment shall be granted for the purpose of deciding the question, unless the Court, for reasons to be recorded, thinks fit to grant such adjournment.] 7. A perusal of the compromise deed reveals that the parties have amicably resolved their inter se disputes relating to the subject matter of the suit and have consciously reduced the terms of settlement into writing. The compromise deed forms part of the present interlocutory application and bears the signatures/thumb impressions of the parties as well as those of the attesting witnesses. 8. This Court has also perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful, voluntary and not opposed to public policy. The compromise pertains directly to the subject matter of the appeal and effectively resolves the disputes between the parties in their entirety. No legal impediment is, therefore, found in recording the same. Page No.# 13/13 9. Accordingly, being satisfied that the compromise has been voluntarily executed by the parties without any force, fraud or coercion, this Court deems it appropriate to allow the present application in exercise of powers under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. 10. Consequently, the interlocutory application stands allowed and a decree is passed in terms of the compromise deed. 11. Resultantly, the connected Regular Second Appeal stands disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 12. Let a decree be drawn up accordingly in accordance with law. 13. Send back the TCR forthwith. JUDGE Comparing Assistant