SMT. SATRUPA TIWARI v. MAYANK PANDE @ MANU @ MAHRAJ
ACQA/74/2021 · 2026-01-20
Shri Radhakishan Agrawal, Smt Rajani Dubey
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 56 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 56 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:3496-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 74 of 2021 1 - Smt. Satrupa Tiwari W/o Shri Bhrigunandan Prasad Tiwari Aged About 62 Years D/o Late Shri Baliram Pandey R/o Village And Post Malhar O.P. Malhar Police Station Masturi Tahsil Masturi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Smt. Premlata Choube W/o Late Shri Sharad Choube Aged About 57 Years D/o Late Shri Baliram Pandey R/o Rudra Vihar, Ashok Nagar Bilaspur, Police Station Sarkanda District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Appellant versus 1 - Mayank Pande @ Manu @ Mahraj S/o Shri Ashok Pande Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Padariya Police Station Takhatpur District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Himanshu Sharma @ Rampi Sharma S/o Shri Ramjeevan Sharma Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Kanvalpur Post Chheenbhog Police Station, Tahsil And District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sarvan @ Shravan Kevat S/o Ramprasad Kevat Aged About 38 Years R/o Village Khajuri Navagaon (Kathakoni) Police Station Chakarbhata District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Harichandra Kevat S/o Rajaram Keva Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Avas Mohalla Padariya, Police Station Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Bilaspur (Police Station Incharge Takhatpur) District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents PRIYANKA VERMA Digitally signed by PRIYANKA VERMA Date: 2026.01.21 16:18:11 +0530
2 For Appellants : None For Respondent No.1 : Ms. Sandhya Baghel, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate For Respondents No.2 to 4 : Mr. R.N. Pusty and Mr. Pallav Mishra, Advocates For State/Respondent No.5 : Mr. Avinash Singh, GA Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey and Hon'ble Shri Justice Radhakishan Agrawal Order on Board 21/01/2026 Per
Rajani Dubey
, J.
1. No one appeared on behalf of the appellants on 14.01.2026 and even today, when the matter was called twice, none appears on their behalf.
2. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this Appeal for want of prosecution.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge
Priyanka