CRL OP No. 19640 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 19640 of 2026 Sudalaikan S/o.Thiruvadi, No.-1, Aani Street, Nadesan Nagar, Virugampakkam, Chennai - 600 092. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State rep by Sub Inspector of Police, R-5 Virugampakkam Police Station, Chennai - 600 093. Crime No.04/2026 2. Solvilangu S/o.Aarumugam, No.41/20, Gandhi Road, Aalvaar Thiru Nagar, Chennai - 600 087 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Sec.528 of B.N.S.S. 2023, praying to call for the records in leading to the C.C.No.1097 of 2026 pending on the file of respondent Police and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.Kannadhasan For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19640 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER 1. This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the proceedings in C.C.No. 1097 of 2027 on the file of the XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate at Saidapet, Chennai for alleged offences under Sections 296(b) and 118(1) of B.N.S., on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case are that the petition the de facto complainant and the accused are relatives and a wordy quarrel arose between them, which escalated into the accused hitting the de facto complainant with the iron rod. Subsequently, the parties have ironed out their differences. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19640 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No.19640 of 2026 stands allowed. The proceedings in C.C.No. 1097 of 2026 on the file of the XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai stands quashed. 23-07-2026 Neutral Citation: Yes/No RPP To 1. XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai 2. The Sub-Inspector of Police, R-5 Virugampakkam Police Station, Chennai-600 093. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19640 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. RPP CRL OP No. 19640 of 2026 23-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis