Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5598 (KAR)

BHAGAWWA SHIVAGOUDA BYALAGOUD ALIAS PATIL v. THE LAND TRIBUNAL ATHANI

WP/101170/2026 · 2026-02-16

K S Hemalekha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2304 WP No. 101170 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO.101170 OF 2026 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. BHAGAWWA SHIVAGOUDA BYALAGOUD @ PATIL AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC: H/W, R/O. SATTI, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. ANNASAHEB BABAGOUDA BYALAGOUDA @ PATIL AGE. 70 YEARS, OCC. AGRIL, R/O. SATTI, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 3. APPASAHEB BALAGOUDA BYALAGOUDA @ PATIL AGE. 68 YEARS, OCC. AGRIL, R/O. SATTI, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 4. RAMAGOUDA BABAGOUDA BYALAGOUDA @ PATIL AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. AGRIL, R/O. SATTI, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 5. IRAGOUDA BABAGOUDA BYALAGOUDA @ PATIL AGE. 63 YEARS, OCC. AGRIL, R/O. SATTI, TQ. ATHANI, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SONU SUHEL N, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE LAND TRIBUNAL ATHANI DIST. BELAGAVI, BY ITS CHAIRMAN-591304. 2. THE ASSITANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI-591201. 3. THE TAHASHILDAR ATHANI DIST. BELAGAVI-591304. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NANDINI B.SOMAPUR, AGA) MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.18 10:31:19 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:2304 WP No. 101170 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE LAND TRIBUNAL TO PASS ORDERS ACCEPTING THE COMPROMISE AS NOTED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL IN THE ORDER SHEET VIDE ANNEXURE-B AS EXPLICITLY AS POSSIBLE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and files a memo to that effect. The memo reads thus: “The petitioners in the top noted petition most respectfully submits that, the prayer sought for in the writ petition render infructuous, in view of the order passed by the Land Tribunal and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as render infructuous in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the memo filed, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- JUSTICE K.S.HEMALEKHA AM Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20