SUNITA UDAI W/O MANOJ KUMAR BAKOLIA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3895/2026 · 2026-03-06
Anand Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5596 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5596 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9586] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3895/2026 Sunita Udai W/o Manoj Kumar Bakolia, Aged About 43 Years, R/o 7, Binakiya Colony, Near Saket Nagar, District Beawar (Raj.) Employee Id- Rjbw200808025873 Now Posted At Lecturer Grade-I (Geography), Govt. Senior Secondary School Kishanpura (221680), District Beawar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan And Ex- Officio Additional State Project Director (Senior), Comprehensive Education Campaign (Smsa), Bikaner (Raj.)
3. Principal, Govt. Senior Secondary School Kishanpura (221680) District Beawar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar Ms. Pooja Sharma for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 06/03/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal filed by the petitioner against transfer order dated 10.01.2026, has been disposed of by the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal vide order dated 20.02.2026, directing the petitioner to make a representation before the competent authority describing her difficulties and objections against the transfer order, and the petitioner is also ready to make a representation; however, hardship of the petitioner has not been
[2026:RJ-JP:9586] (2 of 2) [CW-3895/2026] properly considered by the Tribunal and the petitioner has been transferred in the mid-session.
2. In the light of above, it is directed that in case, any representation is submitted by the petitioner against transfer
order dated 10.01.2026, the competent authority shall decide the same in accordance with law by a speaking order.
3. However, even if the representation is decided against the petitioner, the petitioner shall not be relieved from the present place of posting till 31st of March, 2026, and shall be allowed to continue her work at present place of posting.
4. Writ petition stands disposed of, accordingly.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s), disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /35