Date of reserved for orders : nil Date of pronouncement : 10.07.2026 Date of uploading : 18.07.2026 APHC010215472008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 6963/2008 Between: 1. SHAIK KALESHA, S/O. SK. MAHABHU AGRICULTURE WORKER, INKOLLU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. SYED MASTHANVALI, S/O. SYED KHAMALSA AGRICULTURE WORKER, INKOLLU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SYED MALINBI, W/O. LATE OKHAMALSA AGRICULTURE WORKER, INKOLLU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK RAZIA, W/O.SK. MEERASABUDA AGRICULTURE WORKER, INKOLLU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. SHAIK MEHABOOB SUBHANI, S/O. FETHA AHMAD AGRICULTURE WORKER, INKOLLU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 6. SHAIK ASMAT, W/O. NAYAB RASUL AGRICULTURE WORKER, INKOLLU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GRAM PANCHAYAT INKOLLU VILLAGE INKOLLU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY, 2 PLANNING, CHANDRAMOULINAGAR, 3RD LINE, GUNTUR. 4. P CHENCHU LAKSHMI SUBBAYAMMA, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, NIL, INKOLLU VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ direction order or orders more so, a writ in the nature of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondents in crection of cold storage plant under the name of Rama Tulasamma Cold Storage plant in Sy.No. 399/5 Inkollu Village in the residential area as contrary to law, illegal, unlawful and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondents to take action against the 4th Respondent to prevent him from setting up the Cold Storage Plant and may such pass other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 9118 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to implement the resolution NO. 160 by preventing the respondent for construction of Cold Storage Plant endangering our lives and properties during the pendency of the above writ petition may pass such other orders or orders Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MARRI VENKATA RAMANA 2. G SESHADRI 3. V VINOD K REDDY (SC FOR ZP MPDO GP) 4. GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 6963/2008 ORDER: There is no representation for the petitioners even today also. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the matter in view of the subsequent developments i.e., running of cold storage by the 4th respondent with requisite permissions. 3. Be that as it may. As there is no representation even though the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal, the same is dismissed for non prosecution. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J GVK Whether the order is : Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 4 10 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION No.6963 of 2008 Dt. 10.07.2026 GVK