Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 559 (KAR)

SMT. SUMITRA BAI, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/3806/2023 · 2026-02-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7925 CRL.P No. 3806 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3806 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUMITRA BAI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.3, B-201, 2ND PRAMUK TEMPLE MEADOWS, 27TH CROSS, 2N, BANASHANKARI, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA – 560 017 2. SRI VALI SUBRAMANI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT NO.95, 2ND MAIN ROAD VINAYAKANAGAR, 1ST STAGE, SRINAGAR, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA – 560 050 BOTH PETITIONERS PRESENTLY R/AT:NO.3, PRAMUK TEMPLE MEADOWS, B-301, 27TH CROSS, OPP. SEVAKSHETRA HOSPITAL, BSK 2ND STAGE, BIDARAHALLI BENGALURU – 70. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI GIRISH R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7925 CRL.P No. 3806 of 2023 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY JEEVAN BHEEMANAGAR PS REPRESENTED BY SPP HIGH COURT BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. HARIDAS K., AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS OLD, R/AT NO.86, 3RD FLOOR, SPENCER TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP FOR R-1; R-2 SERVED) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE COMPLAINT AND FIR IN CR.NO.70/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF 10TH ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, MAYOHALL, BANGALORE FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 149 AND 420 OF IPC AND GRANT SUCH OTHER AND FURTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HONORABLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THIS CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7925 CRL.P No. 3806 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned Additional State Public Prosecutor, on instructions and verification of records, would submit that a ‘B’ report has been filed. Therefore, the petition in the form that is presented, is rendered infructuous. Reserving liberty to the petitioners to call in question any order that would be passed by the concerned Court on the ‘B’ report, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BKP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 202