N.Sivasaran v. The State Rep.By, Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/19613/2026 · 2026-07-23
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 55898 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 55898 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 19613 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 19613 of 2026 N.Sivasaran S/o.E.Narasimman, No.8/32, Srinivasa Perumal 3rd Street, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 086. ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The State Rep.By, Inspector of Police, D-4, Zambazaar Police Statio, Chennai District. 2. G.Shankar S/o.Gopal, No.42, Sundaragramani Thottam, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Sec.528 of B.N.S.S. 2023, praying to call for the records pertaining to the F.I.R. registered in Crime No.480 of 2025 against the Petitioner/Accused No.1, pending on the file of the 1st Respondent Police and quash the same as against the petitioner. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Prasanna Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Counsel for Government of Tamil Nadu (Criminal Side) For R1 M.Dhananjayan For R2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19613 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER
1. This Criminal Original Petition seeks to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.35 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, D-4 Zambazaar Police Station, Chennai District for alleged offences under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 311, 351(3) of B.N.S. on the ground of compromise between the parties. The parties are present before the court and, on examination, stand by their compromise and do not want the case to proceed further. 2. The broad contours of the High Court's power to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.p.c. and Section 528 of the BNSS in respect of compromise of non-compoundable offences are laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and other subsequent judgments. 3. The gist of facts leading to the instant case are that on account of uploading of reels by the de facto complainant, the accused are set to have waylaid the de facto complainant, hit him and also snatched away Rs.300/- from him. Subsequently, it is stated that the parties have ironed out their differences. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19613 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
4. Thus, it can be seen that this matter is a fit case for the exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction to quash the case on compromise. 5. Accordingly, this Crl.O.P. No. 19613 of 2026 stands allowed.
The F.I.R. in Crime No. 480 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, D-4 Zambazaar Police Station, Chennai District stands quashed. 23-07-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RPP To
1. The Inspector of Police, D-4 Zambazaar Police Station, Chennai District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 19613 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY J. RPP CRL OP No. 19613 of 2026 23-07-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis