1 2026:CGHC:14368 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3678 of 2022 * - Sharafat Ali S/o Rahat Ali Aged About 62 Years R/o Negi Niwas, Near Old Petrol Pump, Antagarh Road, Narayanpur, District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 – Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions (DPI), Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector District Narayanpur, Collectorate Road, Narayanpur, District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh 4 - District Education Officer Narayanpur, Collectorate Narayanpur, District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Mr. Kalyan Kumar Mistri In Charge Principal In Charge Principal (Original Post Lecturer Lower Body) Swami Atmanand English Medium School Singoditarai, District- Narayanpur, District : Narayanpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents No. 1 to 4 : Mr. Anway Tiwari, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 25/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the order dated 09.03.2022 (ANNEXURE P/1) in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, the petitioner who suffered a monetary loss in terms of payment for services from 10/03/2022 to 30/04/2022 which is Rs.106110/- in numbers one lakh six thousand one Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.03.27 11:23:11 +0530 2 hundred and ten rupees in words to be paid in full, along with the litigation charges. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to pass any other suitable order / orders, relief / reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may find fit and proper in favour of the petitioner safeguarding his interest. 10.4 Any other relief may be granted by this Hon’ble Court as it deems fit under the present circumstances.” 2. The matter is called twice, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner in the first round as well as in the second round. In these circumstances, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti