Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5587 (AP)

Koneru Venkata Satya Ramesh v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/5638/2026 · 2026-07-16

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010350252026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5638/2026 Between: 1. KONERU VENKATA SATYA RAMESH, S/O. RAMACHANDRA RAOAGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,R/O. A.P.T.F.L-402, NIDAMANURU ROAD,NEAR PANCHAYAT OFFICE, PORANKI VILLAGE,PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through the Station House Officer,Penamaluru Police Station, Krishna District,Rep. by the Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. V R MAHESWARA RAO PALETI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to grant pre-arrest bail to the Petitioner/Alleged to be accused in Crime No.20 of 2026 of Penamaluru Urban Police Station, Krishna District, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Section 194 of the ‘BNSS’. 2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. Ms.P.Akhila Naidu, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, submits that the Petitioner has not yet been arraigned as an accused in the said crime. 4. Mr.V.R.Maheswara Rao Paleti, the learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner was served with a notice under Section 179 of ‘the BNSS’ by the Inspector of Police, Gudivada CCS‑II, Krishna District. In the said notice, the Petitioner was required to attend before the Inspector for investigation. It was further mentioned that non‑compliance with the notice would amount to an offence under Section 208 of ‘the BNS’ 5. On perusal of the record, no case has yet been registered against the Petitioner, nor has he been formally arraigned as an accused. Hence, the apprehension of arrest entertained by the Petitioner is premature. 3 6. In view of the above, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to file an appropriate application in accordance with law. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 17.07.2026 PRA Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 82 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5638 of 2026 Date: 17.07.2026 PRA