- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1877 CRL.P No. 101454 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101454 OF 2022 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: 1. T. IMAM SAB S/O T. MAULA SAB AGE. 38 YEARS, R/O. NEAR AMARJYOTHI HOSPITAL, J.P.NAGAR, HOSAPETE, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT-583201. 2. MANJUNATHA S. WRONGLY SHOWN AS MANJUNATHA IN THE CHARGE SHEET S/O YALLAPPA AGE. 33 YEARS, R/O. VIJAYANAGAR BADAVANE HUVINAHADAGALI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR-583219. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SABEEL AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD-580008, THROUGH PSI HOSAPETE TOWN POLICE STATION-583201. 2. SMT. G SUGUNA W/O SRI GANESH R/O. NEAR BASVANNA CANAL D/NO.1785, NEW ASSESSMENT NO.1785 2ND WARD J.P.NAGAR, DIST. VIJAYANAGARA -583201. …RESPONDENTS THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO CALL FOR RELEVANT RECORDS AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2017 PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2026.02.11 15:04:07 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC-D:1877 CRL.P No. 101454 of 2022 JMFC, HOSAPETE IN C.C. NO.1143/2017 THEREBY TAKING COGNIZANCE AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 4 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 380 AND 454 OF IPC, AND QUASH THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AS PER ANNEXURE-G, AND THE IMPUGNED FIR REGISTERED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CRIME NO.23/2017 OF HOSAPETE TOWN POLICE STATION, FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 380, 454 OF IPC AS ANNEXURE-H AND ALSO FILING OF CHARGE SHEET AND ALSO CRIMINAL CASE IN C.C. NO.1143/2017 PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSAPETE, AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 4, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) 1. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections have not been complied with. 2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE RHR/-CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 94