Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5583 (CHH)

MOHD. ARMAN RAIN @ CHILLI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/845/2026 · 2026-03-24

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:14279 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 845 of 2026 Mohd. Arman Rain @ Chilli S/o Late Moh. Imran Rain Aged About 33 Years R/o Sharda Para, Kishan Chowk Behind Amar Tailors Camp 2 Bhilai, Police Station Cantonment, District Durg (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O5cer, P.S. Chhawani, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None For Non-applicant/State : Ms. Smriti Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 25.03.2026 1. This is an o5ce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 12.07.2024 passed in MCRC No. 4877 of 2024, while allowing the bail of the applicant, namely, Mohd. Arman Rain @ Chilli, had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certi=ed copy of that order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on three occasions also this Court had granted extension of KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 time for compliance of the order dated 12.07.2024. 4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Durg District- Durg (C.G.) vide her request letter dated 13.03.2026 has requested for grant of two months time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that the matter is pending for =nal arguments. The learned counsel for the accused has sought time to address =nal arguments. It further appears that the trial could not be concluded within the prescribed period due to pendency of evidence and other procedural stages therefore, it is prayed that a further period of two months may graciously be granted for completion of the trial. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of a certi=ed copy of this order. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed o6 with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certi=ed copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal