APHC010605632009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 330/2009 Between: 1. THE DIVISIONAL OFFICE OF UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,, REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, CHITTOOR. D.NO. 10-114, GANDHI ROAD EXTENSION, CHITTOOR POST AND DISTRICT, A.P. ...APPELLANT AND 1. K RAMEEZA BEE, W/o. Late Gurrappa @ Koguru Sultan Sab, Muslim Widow R/o. Chowdasamudram Village & Post, Mulakalacheruvu Mandal, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated 17-09-2008 passed in O.S.No. 13 of 2000 on the file of District Judge, Chittoor. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 955 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 125 days in representing the ASSR No.13730 of 2008 IA NO: 2 OF 2009(ASMP 1005 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, 2 the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings including execution of the decree passed in O.S.No.13 of 2000 passed on 17.9.2008 on the file of the District Judge, Chittoor IA NO: 1 OF 2015(ASMP 2304 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders passed in AS MP No.1005/09 in AS No.330/2009 dt.15.06.2009 and dismiss the appeal. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP 563 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased bring on the record the Respondent No.2 shows in the above cause title herein as LRs of deceased 1st respondent herein i.e. K.Rameeza Bee in ASMP No.1005/2009 in AS No.330/2009 and permit hims to prosecute the above appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. E VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K ASAD AHAMED The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.330 of 2009 JUDGMENT: When the matter was listed on 10.07.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. Today though the matter was listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal suit. 3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 15.07.2026 LSP 4 04 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.330 of 2009 Date: 15.07.2026 LSP