A No. 3096 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24-07-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A No. 3096 of 2026 in EP No. 126 of 2025 M. Balaji ..Applicant(s) Vs 1. Perim Janardhana Rao Aged About 68 Years, S/o. Perim Raja, No.A-501, Raheja Regency Santhome High Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai 600 028. 2. M/s. Jay AR Enterprises Rep. by its Partner Perim Janardhana Rao, No.7, N.S.Krishnan Street, Eswaran Nagar, Pammal, Chennai 600 075. 3. Perim Janardhana Roa Aged About 68 Years, S/o. Perim Raja, No.A-501, Raheja Regency Santhome High Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai 600 028. 4. K. Rajendra Reddy Aged About 62 Years, S/o. K. Venkatamuni Reddy Raja, Partner, M/s. Jay Ar Enterprises, Old No.10, New No.17-A, 6th Main Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai-600 028. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER:- Application filed to direct payment out of a sum of Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Lakhs only) deposited by the Judgment Debtors to the credit of E.P.No.126 of 2025 in C.S.(Comm.Div).No.941 of 2010, together with accrued interest, if any to the Applicant/Decree Holder. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3096 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Applicant(s): Mr.Sharath Chandran Mr.S.N.Kirubanandam For Respondent(s): Mr.S.I.Sharukumar ORDER The present Application has been filed to direct payment out of a sum of Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Lakhs only) deposited by the Judgment Debtors to the credit of E.P.No.126 of 2025 in C.S.(Comm.Div).No.941 of 2010, together with accrued interest, if any to the Applicant/Decree Holder. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.07.2026, taking note of the earlier deposit of Rs.50,00,000/- pending SLP which came to be dismissed thereafter and also payment of further sum of Rs.5,00,000/-, this Court had directed the Judgment Debtor to file an affidavit of undertaking indicating the schedule of payment of balance amount. An application had been taken out by the Decree Holder for payment out of the amount deposited by the Judgment Debtor particularly in view that the judgment and decree upon which the Execution Petition had been filed had attained its finality in view of the rejection of the SLP even at the stage of condoning delay. The Judgement Debtor even though had indicated that they had sought to file a Review before the Hon’ble Apex Court as of today, there is no Review which had been placed on record and the judgment and decree had attainted its finality. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3096 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 3. In this context, this Court finds no impediment in ordering the application as prayed for and accordingly, the present application stands ordered with a directed to the Registry to pay a sum of Rs.55,00,000/- which has been kept in deposit to the credit of the Execution Petition together with interest on a Memo being filed by the applicant/ Decree Holder without reference to the respondent/ Judgement Debtor. However, there shall be no order as to costs. 24-07-2026 (1/2) Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No GBA https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 3096 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 K.KUMARESH BABU, J. GBA A No. 3096 of 2026 IN EP NO. 126 OF 2025 24.07.2026 (1/2) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis