[2026:RJ-JP:12703] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5359/2026 Pulkit Manuja S/o Late Smt. Neelam Kharre W/o Late Shri Rajendra Kumar Manuja, Aged About 31 Years, R/o 42/08/01, Swarn Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur Division, Mini Secretariat, Banipark, Jaipur, Raj. 2. Zila Parishad, Banipark, Jaipur, Raj. Through Zila Pramukh 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Banipark, Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.M. Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/03/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: vr% ekuuh; U;k;ky; ls lfou; lknj izkFkZuk gS fd ;kph }kjk izLrqr bl mDr fjV ;kfpdk dks mijksDr rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vk/kkjksa ij lO;; Lohdkj Qjek;k tkosa rFkk bl vk'k; dh leqfpr fjV@funsZ'k@vkns'k Qjek;k tkosa fd %& ¼1½ vk;kph la- 3 }kjk ikfjr mDr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 20-12-2023 ¼izn'kZ la- 5½ dks mijksDr rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vk/kkjksa ij fujLr@[kkfjt Qjek;k tkosa rFkk ;kph dks mDr lacaf/kr in ij lsok esa ns; leLr ykHk o ifjykHk lfgr lsok esa fujUrjrk ds lkFk 'kh?kz gh iqu% LFkkfir@cgky fd;k tkdj dk;Z xzg.k djok;s tkus ds vkns'k@funsZ'k v;kphx.k dks Qjek;k tkos gSA rFkk ¼2½ fodYi esa ;kph }kjk fnukad 25-09-2025 dks v;kph la- 1 dks izLrqr foHkkxh; vihy ¼izn'kZ la- 14½ dks tks v;kph la- 1 ds le{k fopkjk/khu gS] dks [2026:RJ-JP:12703] (2 of 2) [CW-5359/2026] 'kh?kz&rk&'kh?kz 15 fnol esa ;kph dks lquokbZ dk volj iznku djrs gq, xq.kkoxq.k ij vfUre :i ls fuf.kZr fd;s tkus dk vkns'k@funsZ'k mDr v;kph la- 1 dks Qjek;k tkosaA rFkk ¼3½ vU; vuqrks"k ekuuh; U;k;ky; Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 226 ds rgr mijksDr rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vk/kkjksa ij U;k;fgr esa tks Hkh mfpr le>s og Hkh ;kph ds i{k esa ikfjr Qjek;k tkosA 2. Mr. Prateek Saxena accepts notice on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG. 3. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG as counsel for respondent. 4. During course of argument, it has been transpired that impugned order is challenged by filing an appeal before the Divisional Commissioner and same is pending before the Divisional Commissioner which is evident from Annexure-14 therefore it is appropriate to dispose of the writ petition with direction to the Divisional Commissioner to dispose of the appeal within a period of 60 days after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 5. Having considered aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1 Divisional Commissioner, Jaipur to consider and decide the appeal filed by the petitioner within a period of 60 days from date of receipt of copy of order after providing opportunity of hearing. 6. Accordingly, writ petition along with misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /49