Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5568 (AP)

M/s. Sri Satya Sai Enterprises, Perecherla, v. The Chief Engineer,

AS/444/2009 · 2026-07-09

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010637212009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] FRIDAY, THE 10th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 444/2009 Between: 1. M/S. SRI SATYA SAI ENTERPRISES, PERECHERLA,, REP. BY ITS PARTNER B.VENKATESWARA RAO, VARADAIAH, HINDU BUSINESS R/O. MAIN ROAD, LAKSHMIPURAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICITY OPERATIONS, VIJAYAWADA ZONE, APSEB BOARD, PRESENTLY TRANSCO OF A.P., P.W.D. GROUNDS, 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, ASSESSMENT CIRCLE, APSEB BOARD, PRESENTLY TRANSCO OF A.P., P.W.D. GROUNDS, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER RURAL OPERATIONS, APSEB BOARD, PRESENTLY NEAR MEDICAL COLLEGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER OPERATIONS, APSEB BOARD, DOKIPARRU, MEDIKONDURU (M), GUNTUR 2 DISTRICT. 5. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER RURAL, APSEB BOARD, PRESENTLY TRANSCO OF A.P., GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): appeal against the Judgment and decree dated 29-05-2009 made in O.S.No. 10 of 2006, on the file of the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Guntur. IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 1342 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the Judgment and Decree dated 29-05-2009 made in O.S.No. 10 of 2006, on the file of the Court of 1st Additional District Judge, Guntur, pending disposal of the above appeal. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N SRIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. . The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.444 of 2009 JUDGMENT: When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present appeal and the same is endorsed on the grounds of appeal. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO 10.07.2026 LSP 4 23 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.444 of 2009 10.07.2026 LSP