Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5565 (RAJ)

VISHRAM GURJAR SON OF KAJODI, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4187/2026 · 2026-03-23

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12160] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1606/2026 Ramnivas @ Bhoval S/o Banesingh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Isaroti, Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar. (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4187/2026 Vishram Gurjar Son Of Kajodi, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Isrota, Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP with Mr. Gulab Singh, SI, PS Kathumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 23/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-applicants. The accused-applicants were arrested in connection with FIR No. 326/2025 registered at Police Station Kathumar, District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109(1) of BNS & 3/25 of the Arms Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections [2026:RJ-JP:12160] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1606/2026] 115(2), 126(2), 109(1), 127(2), 3(5) BNS & 3/25 of the Arms Act dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submit that in the instant matter, the complainant has turned hostile. It is further submitted that a compromise has been entered into inter se the parties. It is also submitted that the applicant, namely Vishram Gurjar, is a senior citizen, aged about 65 years. 3. The Investigating Officer has marked his presence before the Court and has submitted that although the victim has sustained injuries, but he is not able to refute the fact that a compromise has been duly entered into inter se the parties. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application. 5. Heard and considered. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the complainant in the instant matter has turned hostile; that a compromise has been entered into inter se the parties; that the applicant, namely Vishram Gurjar is senior citizen, aged about 65 years, having no criminal antecedents, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ramnivas @ Bhoval S/o Banesingh and Vishram Gurjar S/o Kajodi shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the [2026:RJ-JP:12160] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1606/2026] satisfaction of the learned Trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J RINCHU /68-69