CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 V.Balaji S/o.Venkatesha Nagarajan ..Petitioner Vs The State, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, AWPS Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi. Crime No.87 of 2024. ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in respect of Crime No.87 of 2024 on the file of the respondent, pending investigation. For Petitioner : Mr.G.R.Hari For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Palanivel Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence punishable under Section 75 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 67A of Information Technology Act, 2000 in Crime No.87 of 2024, on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 2. The allegation against the petitioner is that due to money dispute, the petitioner sexually harassed the defacto complainant, recorded the said incident and thereby threatened her with the said recording by demanding money. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioner and the defacto complainant were in a relationship at the time of the alleged occurrence. It is also submitted a counter complaint has been registered against the defacto complainant in Crime No.484 of 2025. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court and he is ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed the anticipatory bail application by reiterating the prosecution case. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the petitioner and defacto complainant were known to each other and the alleged occurrence took place during the year 2024, this Court is of the firm view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required at this length of time.. Hence, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail with certain conditions. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tirukkoyilur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further conditions that: [a] If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned learned Magistrate within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b] The sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the application for suretyship (Judicial Form No.46 annexed to ‘The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019]’. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the Petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the Petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [g] If the petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS. 23.07.2026 smv https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 To 1. The Judicial Magistrate, Tirukkoyilur. 2. The Inspector of Police, AWPS Thirukoilur Police Station, Kallakurichi. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. smv CRL OP No. 19745 of 2026 23.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis