2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3719 BA1 No.604 of 2026 Harjeet Singh Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Chandel, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.380 of 2025 under Section 8/20/60 of NDPS Act, registered at P.S. Ramnagar, District Nainital. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is not a criminal and there is no criminal antecedent of the applicant; he is a person of young age and due to the said false implication his entire carrier is at stake. He submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 22.10.2025. 5. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. As per the FIR and the recovery memo the contraband said to be ganja does not fall within the category of ganja as defined by Section 2(iii)(d) wherein it is stated “ganja, that is, the flowering or fruiting tops of the cannabis plant (excluding the seeds and leaves when not accompanied by the tops), by whatever name they may be known or designated” and the FIR, the recovery memo says that the said contraband also included seeds” 7. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Harjeet Singh be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 9. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 14.05.2026 Arti