[2026:RJ-JP:12870] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2838/2026 Faizal Khan S/o Mohd. Anwar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o House No. 1355 A Ground Floor, Rajeev Gandhi Nagar, New Mustafabad Gokulpur, North East Delhi. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kunal Vashisht For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. S. Shekhawat, PP Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 27/03/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 10/2026 registered at Police Station Jhanpada District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 136 of Electricity Act, 2003. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant has falsely been implicated in the present matter. It is submitted that the applicant is not even named in the FIR. It is further submitted that no notice as required under Section 41A of the Cr.P.C is given by the police to the applicant till date. Reliance in regard of the aforesaid is placed upon the ratio spelled out by the Patna High Court in Navneet Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar arising out of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 38822 of 2025 and upon the GST Registration Certificate and other invoices. [2026:RJ-JP:12870] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2838/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and has submitted that the investigation is still ongoing in the present matter. It is further submitted that prima facie approximately 1585 kgs of aluminum wire from the total of 13,455 kgs stolen wire is recovered from the workplace of the accused-applicant. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that prima facie approximately 1585 kgs of aluminum wire from the total of 13455 kgs stolen wire is recovered from the workplace of the applicant; that the investigation is still ongoing in the present matter, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant. 5. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS stands dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /28