Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5562 (PAT)

Hemendra Kumar @ Hemendra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/398/2026 · 2026-03-16

Rajiv Roy

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.398 of 2026 ====================================================== Hemendra Kumar @ Hemendra Yadav, S/o- Bhikhar Yadav, R/o- Ward No.-4, Mauji Than Singh, P.S- Bakhri, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate of Begusarai. 2. Sub Divisional Officer, Bakhri, P.S.- Bakhri, District- Begusarai. 3. Circle Officer, Gadapura, P.S.- Gadapura, District- Begusarai. 4. S.H.O. of Gadapura Police Station, P.S.- Gadapura, District- Begusarai. 5. The Secretary of Bihar State Religious Trust Board, Vidhyapati Marg, Patna. 6. Mosmat Kajal Devi, W/o- Late Ganesh Das, R/o- Village- Kumharsho, P.O.- Kumharsho, P.S.- Gadapura, District- Begusarai. 7. Ghuran Yadav, S/o- Late Ram Badan Yadav R/o- Village- Kumharsho, P.O.- Kumharsho, P.S.- Gadapura, District- Begusarai. 8. Sadhu Saran Das, S/o- Late Tilak Das R/o- Village- Kumharsho, P.O.- Kumharsho, P.S.- Gadapura, District- Begusarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deovind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Pleader (11) For the Religious Trust Board : Mr. Ganpati Trivedi, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Madan Mohan, Advocate For the Resp. No. 6 to 8 : Mr. Sudhish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 16-03-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) to quash the order dated 1-7-2025, passed by Learned Sub Divisional Officer, Bakhri, (respondent no.-2), by which the both private respondents no.- 7 and 8 were directed to cultivate 10 bigha land and the petitioner was Patna High Court CWJC No.398 of 2026(3) dt.16-03-2026 2/2 directed not to restrain them in cultivating the land. (ii) to grant any other appropriate relief's as your Lordship may deem fit and proper as per facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. At the outset, Mr. Madan Mohan, learned counsel representing the Religious Trust Board has pointed out that the Title Suit No. 67 of 2023 preferred by the petitioner is presently pending before a competent court at Bakhri, Begusarai. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after some arguments, submits that he shall be pursuing the aforesaid Title Suit No. 67 of 2023. 5. Allowing the petitioner to pursue the aforesaid case and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U