Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5556 (JHR)

SIKANDAR SINGH @ SIKENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11635/2025 · 2026-03-17

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7224 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11635 of 2025 --------- Sikandar Singh @ Sikendar Singh, aged about 21 years, son of Birendra Singh, resident of Village Jarsoli, Kathbara, P.O. Remba, P.S. Hirodih, District Giridih, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Choudhary, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sunil Kumar Dubey, A.P.P. --------- 03/Dated:-17.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 295, 79, 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 12 and 14(1) of the POCSO Act and Section 66C, 66E, 67 and 67B of the Information Technology Act in connection with Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 corresponding to POCSO Case No.64 of 2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is a student and he is having no criminal antecedent. He further submits that nothing has been seized from the possession of the petitioner to support the allegation of the informant and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 12.09.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the above coupled with the fact that the petitioner is a student and he is having no criminal antecedent and that the petitioner is in custody since 12.09.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III-cum-Special Court, POCSO, Deoghar in connection with Cyber Crime P.S. Case No. 127 of 2025 corresponding to POCSO Case No.64 of 2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) MARCH 17, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 19.03.2026