APHC010413772017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3606] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4841/2017 Between: 1. GANNABATHULA PEDDI RAJU, S/O.G.RAMA RAO HINDU, AGED 53 YEARS OCC:CULTIVATION R/O.PEDASARAVA VILLAGE NARSAPURAM MANDAL W.G.DISTRICT, AP ...PETITIONER AND 1. BIBBILI KANAKA DURGA, W/ o. Srinivasa Rao Hindu, aged 45 years Occ: Housewife R/o.Bhaggeswaram Village Palakol Mandal, W.G.District Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order passed in C.M.A.No.4/2012 dt.20-06-2017 on the file of the court of the X Additional District Judge, Narsapur, West Godavari District, AP in confirming the order in I.A.No.657/2010 in ATC No.12/2007 dt.07-03- 2012 on the file of the court of the Special Officer(Tenancy) cum Principal Junior Civil Judge, Narsapur, West Godavari District, AP Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TURAGA SAI SURYA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: PKC, J CRP No.4841 of 2017 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CH.PURUSHOTHAM KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4841 of 2017 ORDER: Sri K.Prudhviraj, learned counsel, representing the learned counsel for petitioner on record, submitted arguments. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner herein has filed application before the Tribunal, which was dismissed for default. Again, he filed an application under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC to restore the same, the same was also dismissed, against which, C.M.A. was preferred, the same was also dismissed confirming the order of Tribunal, against which, the present Revision is preferred. 3. Perused the grounds. Considering the grounds and advance of arguments of the learned counsel, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the concurrent findings of the Courts below. Hence, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J Date:17.07.2026 sj PKC, J CRP No.4841 of 2017 3 68 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CH.PURUSHOTHAM KUMAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4841 of 2017 Date:17.07.2026 sj