Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5553 (UTT)

KAMAR AHMED v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/210/2026 · 2026-05-11

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:3577-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 11th May, 2026 Writ Petition (S/B) No. 210 of 2026 Kamar Ahmed ------Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others -----Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Ms. Amitosh Pant, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Sanpreet Singh Azmani, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. S.M.S.Mehta, learned Standing Counsel for the State. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars. 2. Mr. S.M.S. Mehta, learned Standing Counsel for the State does not oppose the prayer. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in terms of the prayer made. 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 11.05.2026 Kaushal 1 2026:UHC:3577-DB 2