Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2026:UHC:3690
BA1 No.427 of 2026 Adil Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the Applicant.
2. Mr. Deepak Joshi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State.
3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime No.77 of 2025 under Section 144, 64 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/4 and 16/17 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act and Section 3, 5, 6, 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention Act), P.S. Piran Kaliyar, District Haridwar.
4.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that main accused Mustafa, who is the owner of the said hotel and other co-accused persons, namely, Saddam, Asif, Sagar and Ajay were also enlarged on bail by this Court vide orders dated 19.06.2025, 25.06.2026, 19.09.2025 and
16.01.2025. He submits that it is a case of parity and applicant is also entitled for parity and requested for bail.
5. Learned State counsel opposed the bail application.
6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Adil be released on bail on his
executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
8. Pending application, if any, stands
disposed of.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
14.05.2026 Arti