Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5551 (GAU)

KABITA DAS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/524/2026 · 2026-05-05

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010050672026 2026:GAU-AS:6162 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : AB/524/2026 KABITA DAS WIFE OF SRI GANESH CH. DAS RESIDENT OF WARD NO.5 H.P. AGARWALLA ROAD P.O.-BARPETA ROAD DIST.BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781315 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : R SARMAH Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER 06.05.2026 1. Heard learned counsel Mr. R. Sarmah for the petitioner Kabita Das who has filed this application under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Page No.# 2/3 2023 with prayer for pre-arrest bail as she is apprehending arrest in connection with Manikpur Police Station Case No. 12/2026 under Sections 61(1)/303(2)/317(2)/317(4)/317(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 R/W Section 23 of the Petroleum Act. 2. Heard Mr. B. Sarmah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent State. 3. The case in brief is that a tanker carrying stolen petroleum products entered into the premises of the petrol pump belonging to the petitioner Kabita Das. 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she had not received any petroleum products despite the fact that the petitioner Kabita Das is the owner of the petrol pump. 5. I have considered the submissions at the Bar. 6. It is submitted that the petitioner who is on interim bail has appeared before the investigating Officer and co-operated with the investigation. She has not violated bail conditions. 7. I have scrutinized the Case Diary. 8. Considering all aspects, the interim order dated 12.03.2026 is hereby made absolute under the condition that she shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when called for the purpose of investigation. 9. In terms of the above observation, this bail application stands disposed of. 10. Send back the Case Diary. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant