Naresh Chauhan Vs. State of H.P. & Ors. CMP(M) No. 283/2026 06.05.2026 Present: Mr. Paras Dhaulta, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1, 2 & 5. Ms. Kiran Lata Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 3 & 4. Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocate, for respondent No. 6. CMP(M) No. 283/2026 None has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No. 7 & 8 despite service, hence they proceeded against ex parte. No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of the respondents. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 93 days’ that has occurred in filing the appeal. Consequently, the present application is allowed and delay of 93 days’ that has occurred in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. RFA No. /2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. ….2…. Mr. Manoj Chauhan, learned Additional Advocate General, Ms. Kiran Lata Sharma and Mr. P.S. Chandel, Advocates, accept service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No. 1, 2 & 5, 3 & 4 and 6, respectively. Let post admission notice be issued to respondents No. 7 & 8 returnable within four weeks, on taking steps within three days. List thereafter. In the meantime, let records of learned Court below be also called for. CMPST No. 64530/2025 At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present application. Consequently, the application is dismissed, as withdrawn. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 6th May, 2026 (raman)