Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028222026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/448/2026 LEGAL HEIRS OF LATE TARUBALA SAHA ON THE DEATH OF JAGDIDH CH SAHA HIS LEGAL HEIR MINATI SAHA 1.2: PRANAB KUMAR SAHA SO LT SRI JAGADISH CH SAHA RO HOWLY TOWN WARD NO 2 MOUZA GHILAJARI PO HOWLY PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 1.3: PRABIR KUMAR SAHA SO LT SRI JAGADISH CH SAHA RO HOWLY TOWN WARD NO 2 MOUZA GHILAJARI PO HOWLY PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 1.4: NABIN SAHA SO LT SRI JAGADISH CH SAHA RO HOWLY TOWN WARD NO 2 MOUZA GHILAJARI PO HOWLY PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 2: PRADIP KUMAR SAHA Page No.# 2/3 SO LATE RAKHAL CH SAHA SO LT SRI JAGADISH CH SAHA RO HOWLY TOWN WARD NO 2 MOUZA GHILAJARI PO HOWLY PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM VERSUS NUR MOHAMMAD SO LATE YAD ALI RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 2:NURUL ISLAM SO LATE YAD ALI RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 3:POLU MIYA SO LATE ABU BAKKAR RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 4:NUR MOHAMMAD SHEIKH SO LATE ABU BAKKAR RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 5:RAMELA KHATUN DO LATE YAD ALI RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 6:FUL KHATUN DO RABIA KHATUN RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 7:RABIA KHATUN DO LATE YAD ALI Page No.# 3/3 RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM 8:MAMELA KHATUN ALIS SAMELA KHATUN DO LATE YAD ALI RO HATIJANA MOUZA GHILAZRI PS AND DIST BARPETA ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. A R SIKDAR Advocate for : MR S HUSSAIN appearing for NUR MOHAMMAD BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 19.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel for the applicants and also heard Mr. S. Hussain, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This is an application under Order XXII Rule 5 CPC for setting aside the abatement of the connected appeal in RSA No. 22/2012. 3. The respondent No.1 expired on 27.06.2025 and due to non-substitution of the legal heirs within the period of limitation, the appeal stood abated. Subsequently, the respondents had submitted application for substitution of the legal heirs by way of I.A.(Civil) No. 449/2026 which has been allowed on the legal heirs of the deceased/respondent No.1 has been substituted. 4. Accordingly, the abatement is set aside. 5. I.A. stands allowed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant