Vijay Shanthi Builders Limited v. Cushman And Wakefield Property Advisors Private Limited
CMP/17991/2026 · 2026-07-24
K Govindarajan Thilakavadi, P Velmurugan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 55481 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 55481 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C.M.P.No.17991 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR.No.158829 of 2023 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 24.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P. VELMURUGAN AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI C.M.P.No.17991 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR.No.158829 of 2023 Vijay Shanthi Builders Limited CIN:L45201TN1992PLC021960 represented by its Managing Director H.Chandan Kumar having its registered office at Old Door No.8, New Door No.21 First Avenue, Indira Nagar Chennai – 600 020 Also having office at 20/43, Kasthuri Rangan Road Alwarpet, Chennai – 600 018. … Petitioner Vs Cushman and Wakefield Property Advisors Private Limited having its registered office at 11th Floor JA 1120-1121 Tower A, DLF Towers Jasola, Jasola District Centre New Delhi, South Delhi, Delhi – 110 025 Also having office at 14th Floor Phase II Tower C, Building No.8 DLF Cyber City, Gurgaon 122022 Haryana
.. Respondent https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P.No.17991 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR.No.158829 of 2023 __________ Page2 of 4 Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order II Rule 4(19) of A.S.Rules, to condoning the delay of 719 days in remitting the deficit Court Fee of Rs.2,81,982/- in A.S.SR.No.158829 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kempraj For Respondent : Mr.S.Aravindan O R D E R (Made by P.Velmurugan J.) This miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 719 days in remitting the deficit Court Fee of Rs.2,81,982/- in the above appeal.
2. Heard Mr.M.Kempraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Aravindan, learned counsel who entered appearance for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.
3. The learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to allow the petition.
4. On being satisfied with the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this petition and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the delay is condoned. Accordingly, this miscellaneous petition is ordered. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P.No.17991 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR.No.158829 of 2023 __________ Page3 of 4
5. The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and also print the name of the counsel for the respondent in the cause list.
(P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 24.07.2026 ms https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.P.No.17991 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR.No.158829 of 2023 __________ Page4 of 4 P.VELMURUGAN J. AND K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI J. ms C.M.P.No.17991 of 2026 in Appeal (CAD) SR.No.158829 of 2023 24.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis