Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5547 (AP)

Shaik Mohammod Raja, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6869/2026 · 2026-07-15

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010125402026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 16th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6869/2026 Between: 1. SHAIK MOHAMMOD RAJA,, S/O. JANI SAHED, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 1-7-6, GUJJANAGUNDIA, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMI TEMPLE, PATTABIPURAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK ISMAIL,, S/O. JANI SAHED, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.1-7-6, GUJJANAGUNDIA, NEAR ANJANEYA SWAMI TEMPLE, PATTABIPURAM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522236 2. THE GUNTUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.BY ITS COMMISSIONER, GUNTUR, 522503 GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. GURRALA SIVA SHANKAR RAO, S/O SAMBAIAH, R/O. SRI NILAYAM APARTMENTS, 1ST LINE UDYAGA NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522006 4. GURRALA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O PUNNA RAO, R/O.D NO. 1- 3-28/8, OPP TO POWER HOUSE PEDAPALAKAURU ROAD, GUJJANAGUNDIA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522007 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no.2 in not taking any action against the illegal constrcution that is being made by respondent no. 3 and 4 in an extent of 316 sq.yds in D.No.1-3- 28/8C situated at Gujjanagundia, Guntur, Guntur District as illegal,arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice, article 21, 300-A of constitution of india and AP Muncipal Corporation Act 1955 and also violation of Rule 6(b) of GOMs no. 225 dated 12-11-2025 consequently direct the respondent no.2 to demolish the construction carried out by the respondent no. 3 and 4 without there being any permission and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent no.2 to forthwith prevent the respondent 2 no.3 and 4 to not to make any constrcution in an extent of 316 sq.yds in D.No.1-3-28/8C situated at Gujjanagundia, Guntur, Guntur District pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the Status-Quo passed in W.P.No.6869/2026, dated: 11-03-2026 and prays the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the W.P.No.6869/2026 as devoid of merits, in the interest of justice, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CHILUKURI NARENDRA BABU 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.6869 of 2026 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 16.07.2026 KGM Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 79 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.6869 of 2026 Dated 16.07.2026 KGM