Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5546 (PNJ)

KAMAL BHATI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/5511/2026 · 2026-04-07

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 124 CWP-5511-2026 Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 KAMAL BHATI ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sumit Adhana, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondent-DHBVNL Faridabad *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of assessment order dated 28.11.2017 whereby respondent has raised demand of electricity charges of Rs.5,43,831/- and compounding notice dated 28.11.2017 whereby respondent has proposed compounding fee. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that impugned order may be set aside with liberty to pass fresh order in view of judgment of this Court in “Rattan Singh Vs. State of Haryana & Ors.”, LawFinder Doc ID #2869383. 3. Disposed of in terms of Rattan Singh (supra). 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE April 07, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.07 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document