THE GENERAL MANAGER RENUKA JI PROJECT, HPPCL AND ANR v. HARI SINGH AND ORS
CMP/3161/2026 · 2026-03-23
Sushil Kukreja
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5546 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 5546 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
The General Manager Ranuka Ji & ors. Vs. Hari Singh & ors. CMPs No.3160 & 3161 of 2026 in RFA No.104 of 2019 23.03.2026 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the non-applicants/appellants. Ms. Shashi
Kiran,
Advocate,
for applicant/respondent No.1. Mr. Balwinder Singh Ballu, Deputy Advocate General, for non-applicants/respondents No.2 & 3. CMP No3160 of 2026
The present application has been filed under Order 1, Rule 10, CPC for bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-Hari Singh, who has expired on
20.11.2025. 2. No reply is intended to be filed to the application. 3. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported with the affidavit of one of the applicants, namely, Jai Prakash as well as death certificate of respondent No.1- Hari Singh, the present application is allowed and the legal heirs of deceased respondent No.1-Hari Singh, as mentioned in para-2 of the application, are ordered to be impleaded in his place as respondents No.1(a) to 1(e), after setting aside the abatement, if any. Amended memo of parties, is ordered to be taken on record. 5. The application stands disposed of. CMP No.3161 of 2026
6. The instant application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed by applicants/respondents No.1(a) to 1(e), for
release of the awarded amount of compensation, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. 7 As per the applicants, they are in dire need of money for construction of the house as well as to return the loans taken from their friends. Therefore, it is prayed that the enhanced awarded amount of compensation, along-with up-to-date interest, may be released in their favour as per their respective shares. The application is duly supported with the affidavits of the applicants. 8 Learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants submitted that he does not want to file any reply to the application and has no objection in case the amount is released in favour of the applicants/respondents No.1(a) to 1(e). 9. Heard.
Having perused the averments made in the application, which are duly supported with the affidavits of applicants/respondent No.1(a) to 1(e), this Court finds it in the interest of justice to release the enhanced awarded amount of compensation alongwith up-to-date interest in favour of the applicants/respondents No.1(a) to 1(e), in equal shares, after proper verification and identification by remitting the same to their respective bank accounts, copies whereof have been annexed alongwith the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja )
Judge March 23 2026 (V.Himalvi)