Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5541 (ALL)

RAVI MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/35873/2026 · 2026-09-07

Chawan Prakash

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 35873 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Mr. Dev Prakash Singh, learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.for the State. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS by the applicant with the following prayer: "It is, therefore, most respectfully that this Hon'ble court may graciously be pleased to allow the present application and be pleased to quash the entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 2183 of 2026 (State Vs Ravi Mishra) arising out from the impugned cognizance order dated 02.04.2026 passed by the learned Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) F.T.C., Chitrakoot over the chargesheet dated 19.03.2026 submitted by the investigating officer in Case Crime No. 104 of 2026, Under Section 85, 115(2), 351(3) of B.N.S. and 3/4 D.P. Act, related to Police Station Karwi District Chitrakoot on the basis of compromise dated 12.08.2026." 3. Learned Counsel for applicants submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that parties have amicably resolved their personal dispute, therefore, opposite party no.2 does not want to get adjudication of alleged criminal act and prayed that the aforesaid criminal case may be quashed in pursuance to compromise. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State submits no objection if the parties approach Trial Court to file compromise in the given circumstances. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjana Singh, Dev Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Mishra .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Whether the parties have entered into compromise, can best be adjudicated by the Trial Court. As such, the parties may appear before the Trial Court concerned and file the compromise entered into between the parties within 30 days, which shall be verified by the Trial Court. 6. No compromise shall be entertained by the Trial Court if the informant/victim/injured and accused are not signatories and appear before the Court of its verification. In case of exigency, the Trial Court shall apply its mind and pass appropriate order. 7. For a period of two months, the proceedings of the Trial Court shall be kept in abeyance, if the compromise is filed and verified within stipulated period, otherwise, the Trial Court shall continue with the trial. 8. All the parties, who files compromise and get it verified, shall then file a joint application invoking inherent power of this Court to quash the criminal proceeding. 9. In view of above, the application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is, accordingly, disposed of. September 8, 2026 Vijay NA528 No. 35873 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KUMAR SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad