Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5534 (AP)

L.KRUPAKARAN v. K.DASARADHA REDDY

CRLRC/202/2019 · 2026-07-08

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders :Nil Date of pronouncement : 09.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010053692019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY, THE 9th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 202/2019 Between: L.KRUPAKARAN, S/O M.SUBRAMANYAM REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51YRS, R/O RAMIREDCIYPALEM MEENJURU POST, PONNERI T.K., TIRUVAILUR DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. K DASARADHA REDDY, , S/O KADURU SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56YRS, R/O MATHERIRNITTA VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR POST, VARADAIAHPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. K AUDEMMA, W/O LATE K.SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67YRS, R/O IVIATHERIMITTA VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR POST, VARADAIAHPAIEM FVLANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. V AMARENDRUDU, S/O V.VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40YRS, R/O KADURU VARACIALAHPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. CHINNIN CHINNI JACOB, S/O CHINNI CHINNI SUBBAIAH AGED ABOUT 60YRS, R/O CHILAMATHUR VILLAGE AND POST, VARADAIAHPALM MANDAL, CHITTOCR DISTRICT. 5. P JANARDHAN, S/O AUDEPPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 40YRS, R/O RVIATHERIMITTA VILLAGE, CHILAMATHUR POST, 2 VARADAIAHPAIERN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. K MUNASWARNY, S/O E.KRISHNAIAH,AGED ABOUT 45YRS, R/O APPAIAHPAEM VILLAGE, SATHYAVEDU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 7. E MUUNASWAMY, S/O E.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 56YRS, R/O KRY COLONY,. CINNA PANDURU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. A MANOHER, S/O LATE A.RAJAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45YRS, R/O CHILAMATHUR VILLAGE AND POST, VARADAIAHPAIERN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. Y MASTHAN, D.NO.2/66/1, CHILAMATHUR VILLAGE AND POST, OVARDAIAHPALEM MANDAL, CHITTOORDIST. 10. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADAESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): A CHANDRAIH NAIDU 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. 2. In view of the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 09.07.2026 RSI Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 15 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.202 of 2019 Date: 09.07.2026 RSI