W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3885 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.07.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3885 of 2026 1.S.Karthik 2.P.Saravanan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madurai City North, Madurai District. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thallakulam, Madurai District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District. 5.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District. 6.C.Rajkumar ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent no.1 and 3 to consider 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3885 of 2026 the petitioner's representation dated 12.07.2026 and direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere in the civil dispute between the petitioners and the 6th respondent. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Ravi for Mr.A.K.Manikkam For R1 - R5 : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.) ORDER Seeking to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.07.2026 and direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to interfere in a civil dispute between the petitioners and the 6th respondent, this writ petition is filed. 2. Since no adverse order is passed against the private respondent, notice to the private respondent is dispensed with. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it is all a civil dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent. Earlier, the 6th respondent had come before this Court by filing a writ petition in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3285 of 2026 seeking police protection. However, this Court was pleased to dismiss the same, directing the 6th respondent herein to work out his remedy before the appropriate Civil Court. Thereafter, he had lodged another complaint before the 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3885 of 2026 3rd respondent which was forwarded to the 4th respondent. On receipt of the same, the 4th respondent is continuously harassing the petitioner by meddling in the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent. 4. The learned Government Advocate(crl.) submitted that already complaint and counter complaint has been received and C.S.R.Nos.607 & 608 have been issued and the same is pending for enquiry. 5. Heard the learned counsels on either side and carefully perused the materials available on record. 6. Since this Court has already passed an order directing the petitioner not to meddle with the civil dispute between the petitioner and the 6th respondent, it is made clear that the police should not meddle in civil disputes. 7. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. 14.07.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No gbg 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3885 of 2026 TO:- 1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai District. 2.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madurai City North, Madurai District. 3.The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thallakulam, Madurai District. 4.The Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District. 5.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thallakulam Police Station, Madurai District. 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3885 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. gbg Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3885 of 2026 Dated 14.07.2026 (2/2) 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis