Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 553 (KAR)

C. D. SANJAYRAJ v. SRINIVAS REDDY

MFA/5832/2017 · 2026-02-24

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11421 MFA No. 5832 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.5832 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. C. D. SANJAYRAJ SON OF C.H.DEVARAJ, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.4, BENSON TOWN, BENSON CROSS ROAD, BANGALORE. REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER N. SRINIVAS, SON OF NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.820, 8TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095. 2. M/S. GOLDEN GATE REAL PROJECTS REGISTERED BEFORE THE REGISTRAR OF FIRMS, KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU, HAVING ITS OFFICE AT "GOLDEN HOUSE" NO.820, 8TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 095. REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED PERSON SRINIVAS. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. R MADHUSUDHANA REDDY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11421 MFA No. 5832 of 2017 AND: 1. SRINIVAS REDDY SON OF HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT HALANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, NEAR SRIRAMA TEMPLE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 2. GOPALA REDDY SON OF HANUMANTHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT HALANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, NEAR SRIRAMA TEMPLE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 3. KRISHNAPPA SON OF NOT KNOWN TO THE APPELLANT, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT 1ST FLOOR, ISHWARYA VALUE MARKET, KASAVANAHALLI MAIN ROAD, AMRITHA COLLEGE ROAD, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 4. S. RAMESH KUMAR SON OF H. SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT HALANAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, CARMELRAM POST, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK. 5. NARAYANASWAMY SON OF MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT MAHADEVA KODIGAE HALLI VILLAGE, - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11421 MFA No. 5832 of 2017 JALA HOBLI, NORTH ADDITIONAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT-562 149. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. LOKESH K., ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 104 READ WITH ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Sri.Vijayakumar, counsel on behalf of Sri.Lokesh K., for the caveator / respondent No.1 appeared through video conferencing. The captioned appeal is filed to set aside the order dated:25.04.2017 passed by the Court LX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, (CCH-61) on I.A.Nos.2 and 3 in O.S.No.6181/2016. 2. The Registry concerned has furnished the E-court status of O.S.No.6181/2016. A perusal of the same depicts that the suit has been disposed on 21.08.2025. In view of disposal - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11421 MFA No. 5832 of 2017 of the suit, nothing survives for consideration in the captioned appeal. 3. Resultantly, the appeal is dismissed as infructuous. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42