Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010289772025 2026:GAU-AS:1275 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/30/2026 SRI JALILUR RAHMAN ALIAS JALIL ALI SON OF LATE HARMUJ ALI, AN ORIGINAL INHABITANT OF KHAIBARI PAM, P.O. MANIKPUR, P.S. BAGHBAR, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781308 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLAGE PATLIKUCHI, P.O. BARPALLI, P.O. BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN 781314. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P., ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S N TAMULI, C GOGOI,MS P DEKA,MS. A BEGUM,MS. P K ZANNAT Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 02.02.2026 Heard Mr. S.N. Tamuli, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public prosecutor for the State. Page No.# 2/3 2. By this petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, the petitioner namely, Sri Jalilur Rahman @ Jalil Ali has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail, apprehending arrest in connection with PRC Case No. 493 of 2022 (arising out of Khetri P.S. Case No. 17 of 2015) under Sections 120(B)/ 302/ 201/ 379 of the IPC, pending in the Court of the learned SDJM (S)-II, Kamrup (M), Guwhati. 3. The charge sheet has been submitted against the six persons, out of which two persons including the present petitioner has been shown as absconder. The I.O. has stated after investigation that the accused persons killed the driver of the vehicle of the informant and sold it out. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that similarly situated accused person has been granted interim pre-arrest bail vide order dated 19.12.2025 passed in A B. No. 3006/2025 under Section 120(B)/ 302/201/379 of the IPC, the petitioner may be granted similar relief. 5. The petitioner was granted interim bail on 09-01-2026 with conditions. It is submitted that pursuant thereof, the petitioner appeared before the learned Committal Magistrate and submitted bail bonds which were accepted. The case is pending for committal and commencement of trial, if any. 6. In view of the stage of the case, I am of the considered view that subject to suitable conditions to address integrity of evidence, the bail petition can be allowed. 7. In such view of the matter, the interim bail is hereby made absolute, subject to the conditions that – (i) the petitioner shall be available Page No.# 3/3 for the trial; (ii) shall not hamper or tamper with evidence; shall not intimidate or harass or harm or try to influence the informant and family members; and (iv) shall not try to influence or intimidate or harm any witnesses. 8. Violation of the bail conditions would make the bail liable to be cancelled. 9. It appears that the original case record and case diary has been received and the same be returned back the learned trial court. 10. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant