Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 553 (ALL)

SMT. SWARNLATA JAIN AND 3 OTHERS v. SANDEEP GODHA AND 2 OTHERS

A227/3410/2026 · 2026-03-17

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3410 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. This petition has been filed against the order passed by the Appellate Court rejecting the application filed by the petitioner under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC. 3. The order impugned is appealable under Order 43 Rule 1(t) CPC. 4. In view of the same, I am not inclined to interfere with the matter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the remedy, as available to them, under the law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioners after retaining xerox copy of the same on record. March 18, 2026 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : Madhav Jain (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Smt. Swarnlata Jain And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) Sandeep Godha And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad