KABILA v. THE STATE OF TAMINADU REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
CRL OP(MD)/15015/2026 · 2026-07-22
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 55283 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 55283 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP(MD). No.15015 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 22.07.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD)No.15015 of 2026 1.N.Kabila 2.R.Saranya ... Petitioners / A6 and A7
Versus The State of Tamil Nadu rep by The Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Dindigul District. (Crime No.244 of 2026) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER :-Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.244 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, or on their appearance. For Petitioners : Mr.B.Anandan
For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel for State of TN (Criminal Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.15015 of 2026
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest in connection with Crime No.244 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, seek the relief of anticipatory bail.
2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, it was brought to the notice of this Court that this is the second anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioners. The earlier anticipatory bail petition in Crl.O.P. (MD) No.12854 of 2026 was dismissed by this Court on 30.06.2026 on the grounds extracted hereunder:
“ 5. I have gone through the FIR and also the connected materials. Reading of the FIR reveals that majority of the articles stolen were with the petitioners herein and if the petitioners granted anticipatory bail, there is no possibility to recover the jewels, hence, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.”
3. Admittedly, there is no subsequent change in circumstances after the dismissal of the earlier anticipatory bail petition. In the absence of any new or supervening circumstance warranting reconsideration, this 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.15015 of 2026 Court finds no valid ground to entertain the present anticipatory bail petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
22.07.2026 pal To 1.The Inspector of Police, Oddanchatram Police Station, Dindigul District. 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP(MD). No.15015 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR
,J.
pal
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.15015 of 2026 Date : 22.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis