Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5528 (CHH)

SMT. GAJMATI BHANU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CONT/354/2025 · 2026-01-13

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:2321 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 354 of 2025 Smt. Gajmati Bhanu W/o Amar Singh Bhanu Aged About 54 Years R/o Village - Semra, Post - Semra, Tahsil - Pendra-Road, District - Gaurella-Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretory Department Of Panchayat, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Collector Kamlesh Leena Mandavi, District Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director Panchayat Pendra Road, District Gaurella-Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 4 - Amit Beck Sub-Divisional Officer, Pendra-Road, District Gaurella-Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 5 - Director Project (Drda), District Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 6 - The Chief Executive Officer District Janpad Panchayat Gaurella, District Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh 7 - Toofan Singh S/o Balkishan Singh Aged About 42 Years R/o Village - ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.15 11:06:41 +0530 2 / 2 Dumariya, Under Village Panchayat - Semra, Post - Semra, Tahsil - Pendra- Road, District Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh (Presently Working As Up-Sarpanch Of Village – Semra) 8 - Kishan Rathor S/o Chhabi Lal Rathor Aged About 45 Years R/o Village - Semra, Post - Semra, Tahsil - Pendra-Road, District Gaurella-Pendra- Marwahi, Chhattisgarh (Secretory Of Village - Panchayat - Taraigaon Tahsil - Pendra-Road, District Gaurella-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Chaturvedi, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Hemant Gupta, Advocate For State/Respondent no. 3 & 6 : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 14/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this contempt petition with liberty to pursue cont. no. 1879 of 2025, as it was duly constituted contempt petition. 2. In view of submission made by learned counsel for petitioner, this contempt petition stands dismissed as not pressed with liberty as prayed for. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza