Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5527 (UTT)

SHAVEJ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/712/2026 · 2026-05-11

Ashish Naithani

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2 1 . BA] SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2026:UHC:3565 BA1 No.712 of 2026 Shavej Vs. State of Uttarakhand Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State. 3. Present bail application is moved by the applicant, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/Case Crime No.153 of 2026 under Section 3, 6, 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; there was no public witness; no incriminating article, weapon, vehicle or bovine animal has been recovered at the instance of the applicant. He submits that applicant has no criminal history. He further submits that applicant is ready to furnish any condition imposed by this Court if he is enlarged on bail. 5. Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, bail application is allowed. Let the applicant-Shavej be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the condition that he will not misuse the bail and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings. 8. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 11.05.2026 Arti