Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 5526 (RAJ)

MANOHARLAL S/O BABULAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5929/2026 · 2026-04-17

Sangeeta Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16291] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5929/2026 1. Manoharlal S/o Babulal, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Khara Dera, Police Station Sedwa, District Barmer. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambharlek) 2. Satyaprakash @ Satish S/o Bhagirath, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Goda, Police Station Sedwa, District Barmer. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Sambharlek) ----Accused-Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandey For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 17/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 47/2025 registered at Police Station Dudu, District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 19, 54 & 54(A) of Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that petitioners are behind the bars since 14.03.2026; there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners. He further submits that co-accused persons namely Prakash Chand @ Pappu, Bhanwraram @ Pintu, Mangilal and Aashif Ayub have already been enlarged on bail by [2026:RJ-JP:16291] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5929/2026] the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 02.04.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4010/2026, 24.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4467/2026, 09.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 2861/2026 and 19.12.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 16390/2025 respectively; conclusion of trial may take a long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; petitioners are behind the bars since 14.03.2026; co- accused persons have already been enlarged on bail by Co- ordinate bench of this Court; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Manoharlal S/o Babulal and Satyaprakash @ Satish S/o Bhagirath are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:16291] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5929/2026] 6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. SANGEETA SHARMA),J SHIVANI/73