[2026:RJ-JP:13502] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 618/2026 Raghuveer Singh S/o Dharmchand, Aged About 43 Years, R/o House No. 42/86/05, Varun Path, Police Station Mansarovar, District Jaipur. (At Present Petitioner Confined At Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Garhwal, Mr. Nishant Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP, Mr. Sudhir Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 644/2016 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur East for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR itself is delayed by almost 11 months. It is also contended that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and in a similar report lodged by the complainant family members, the petitioner has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, [2026:RJ-JP:13502] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-618/2026] therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner has forged the pattas which was received from the complainant. It is also contended that the petitioner remained absent during investigation and under Section 37 of the Police Act, standing warrant was issued against the petitioner. It is further contended that similar nature of FIR was also lodged against the petitioner alleging fraud and cheating with the other family members of the complainant. It is also contended that in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.15336/2025, the bail application of the accused-petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 17.12.2025 by the Co-ordinate Bench, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. It is not desirable to express anything upon the merits of the case. Considering the facts of the case and arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and period of incarceration, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Raghuveer Singh S/o Dharmchand, in connection with FIR No. 644/2016 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur East, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before [2026:RJ-JP:13502] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-618/2026] the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The accused-petitioner is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. 9. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/22